Catalogue


Presentation of future research needs [electronic resource] /
prepared for, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by, Future Research Needs Presentation Workgroup ; workgroup members, Robert L. Kane ... [et al.].
imprint
Rockville, MD : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, [2012]
description
1 online resource (1 PDF file (vi, 19 p.))
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Rockville, MD : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, [2012]
restrictions
Licensed for access by U. of T. users.
general note
"April 2012."
"Contract No. 290-2007-10064-I."
abstract
OBJECTIVE: To recommend a more standardized and systematic approach to presenting and organizing future research needs in Future Research Needs (FRN) documents. METHODS: A workgroup representing five Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs) that are engaged in future research needs work reviewed prior effort on this topic and prepared a set of draft recommendations and frameworks, which were circulated to the remaining EPCs. Feedback on the working version was obtained from the EPC program at the May 2011 EPC meeting. All feedback was incorporated into the final report. FINDINGS: The workgroup developed separate frameworks for methods-related FRN recommendations and topic-specific FRN recommendations. Examples of methods-related issues include design issues, actions that facilitate the aggregation of results, inclusion of multiple disciplinary perspectives, and subgroup analysis. For topic-related FRNs, the PICOTS (Patient, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Timing, and Setting) formulation should be used for each topic. The level of detail in presenting FRN recommendations will vary with the topic. Research in some areas may have sufficiently developed to the point where the gap can be precisely defined. EPCs should exercise judgment in determining the level of detail based on their understanding of the state of the science. The FRN should be presented in tiers rather than as a numerical ranking and should include a clear rationale for prioritization, based on considerations such as societal burden, feasibility, and likelihood of effect. An analytic framework should be used, if possible, and may be adapted. Specific recommendations for research design considerations should be made judiciously and framed as suggestions. Like the description of the future research need, the detail for these research design considerations may vary with the circumstance and topic. The executive summary should include the FRNs with the rationale for prioritization, without the PICOTS or research design considerations.
catalogue key
9080255
 
Includes bibliographical references.
Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850; www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-2007-10064-I, Prepared by: Future Research Needs Presentation Workgroup

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem