Catalogue


Writing history for the king : Henry II and the politics of vernacular historiography /
Charity Urbanski.
imprint
Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2013.
description
xi, 252 p.
ISBN
0801451310 (cloth : alk. paper), 9780801451317 (cloth : alk. paper)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2013.
isbn
0801451310 (cloth : alk. paper)
9780801451317 (cloth : alk. paper)
catalogue key
9062696
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. 217-240) and index.
A Look Inside
Reviews
Review Quotes
"Writing History for the King features a reevaluation of the reign of Henry II, who has traditionally been considered the most secure and powerful king of England in the High Middle Ages. Charity Urbanski suggests that Henry's authority in England and Normandy was 'remarkably tenuous in some ways' and that the future of his dynasty was far from certain. Urbanski argues that Henry II commissioned Wace and Benoît de Sainte-Maure to provide a legitimizing, genealogically framed account of early Norman history that would strengthen and ultimately secure his legitimacy. Urbanski's lucid and fluidly written book is novel in its interpretation both of the texts under consideration and their function, and of the political situation that originally engendered them. Everyone interested in Anglo-Norman historiography will want to read Writing History for the King."-Gabrielle Spiegel, Krieger-Eisenhower Professor of History, The Johns Hopkins University, author of Romancing the Past: The Rise of Vernacular Prose Historiography in Thirteenth-Century France
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Summaries
Bowker Data Service Summary
This title is at once a reassessment of the reign of Henry II of England (1133-1189) and an original contribution to our understanding of the rise of vernacular historiography in the high Middle Ages. Urbanski focuses on two dynastic histories commissioned by Henry: Wace's 'Roman de Rou' (c. 1160-1174) and Benoit de Sainte-Maure's 'Chronique des ducs de Normandie' (c. 1174-1189).
Main Description
Writing History for the King is at once a reassessment of the reign of Henry II of England (11331189) and an original contribution to our understanding of the rise of vernacular historiography in the high Middle Ages. Charity Urbanski focuses on two dynastic histories commissioned by Henry: Wace's Roman de Rou (c. 11601174) and Benoît de Sainte-Maure's Chronique des ducs de Normandie (c. 11741189). In both cases, Henry adopted the new genre of vernacular historical writing in Old French verse in an effort to disseminate a royalist version of the past that would help secure a grip on power for himself and his children. Wace was the first to be commissioned, but in 1174 the king abruptly fired him, turning the task over to Benoît de Sainte-Maure. Urbanski examines these histories as part of a single enterprise intended to cement the king's authority by enhancing the prestige of Henry II's dynasty. In a close reading of Wace's Rou, she shows that it presented a less than flattering picture of Henry's predecessors, in effect challenging his policies and casting a shadow over the legitimacy of his rule. Benoît de Sainte-Maure's Chronique, in contrast, mounted a staunchly royalist defense of Anglo-Norman kingship. Urbanski reads both works in the context of Henry's reign, arguing that as part of his drive to curb baronial power he sought a history that would memorialize his dynasty and solidify its claim to England and Normandy.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem