Catalogue


Alexandria and the moon : an investigation into the lunar Macedonian calendar of Ptolemaic Egypt /
by Chris Bennett.
imprint
Leuven ; Walpole, MA : Peeters, 2011.
description
276 p. ; 24 cm.
ISBN
9042925051, 9789042925052
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Leuven ; Walpole, MA : Peeters, 2011.
isbn
9042925051
9789042925052
contents note
Introduction -- Patterns of use of the Macedonian calendar -- Macedonian calendar in Alexandria -- Macedonian New Year after Zenon -- Macedonian calendar after Zenon -- Macedonian New Year before Zenon -- Purpose of biennial intercalation -- Appendix A. Detecting Canopic dates -- Appendix B. Macedonian New Year outside Egypt -- Appendix C. Macedonian intercalation outside Egypt.
local note
ROM copy: Errata slip tipped in.
catalogue key
8535335
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. [xvii]-xxxvi) and index.
A Look Inside
Summaries
Long Description
This book is the first comprehensive study of the lunar Macedonian calendar in two decades. The mechanics of the calendar are examined in detail, and a new approach for reconstructing the sequence of intercalary months and years is proposed which, for the first time, permits a consistent interpretation of the papyrological data of the middle Ptolemaic period. It is shown that in c. 265 BC Ptolemy II deliberately set in motion a process to realign the calendar over an extended period, which ended early in the reign of Ptolemy IV. The results have implications for the origins of the financial year, the date of the Ptolemaieia, and the history of the Canopic reform of the Egyptian calendar, among other topics. Appendices consider the nature of Macedonian intercalation and the New Year outside Egypt. The study is of interest to students of ancient calendars, Ptolemaic chronology, and Hellenistic history.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem