Catalogue

COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

Heavenly stuff : the constitution of the celestial objects and the theory of homocentric spheres in Aristotle's cosmology /
Theokritos Kouremenos.
imprint
Stuttgart : Franz Steiner, c2010.
description
150 p. ; 25 cm.
ISBN
3515097333, 9783515097338 (alk. paper)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
Subjects
personal subject
More Details
imprint
Stuttgart : Franz Steiner, c2010.
isbn
3515097333
9783515097338 (alk. paper)
language note
Includes some text in Greek.
catalogue key
8212792
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. [141]-144) and index.
A Look Inside
Reviews
This item was reviewed in:
Reference & Research Book News, April 2011
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Summaries
Long Description
This book offers a reappraisal of basic aspects of Aristotelian cosmology. Aristotle believed that all celestial objects consisted of the same substance that pervade the heavens, a stuff unlike those found near the center of the cosmos that compose us and everything in our immediate surroundings. Kouremenos argues that, contrary to the received view, Aristotle originally introduced this heavenly stuff as the matter of the stars alone, the remotest celestial objects from the Earth, and as filler of the outermost part of the heavens, forming a diurnally rotating spherical shell whose fixed parts are the stars, the crust of the cosmos which has the Earth at its center. The author also argues that, contrary to another common view, at no point in the development of his cosmological thought did Aristotle believe the heavens to be structured according to the theory of homocentric spheres developed by his older contemporary Eudoxus of Cnidus, in which the other celestial objects, the five planets known in antiquity, the Sun and the Moon, were hypothesized to move uniformly in circles, as if they were fixed stars. German text.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem