Stealing the state [electronic resource] : control and collapse in Soviet institutions /
Steven L. Solnick.
Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1998.
xiv, 337 p. ; 24 cm.
More Details
Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1998.
Licensed for access by U. of T. users.
catalogue key
Includes bibliographical references (p. [259]-328) and index.
A Look Inside
Review Quotes
Amid lamentations over 'reforms' stymied by Communist troglodytes, the repudiation of socialism and the dissolution of the Soviet Union seemed to come out of the blue. An institutional loss of confidence turned into a self-fulfilling spiral. 'Soviet institutions,' explains Steven L. Solnick, 'were victimized by the organizational equivalent of a colossal bank run.' Soviet officials sensed the impending doom, and they 'rushed to claim...assets before the bureaucratic doors shut for good.' Of course, 'unlike [in] a bank run, the defecting officials were not depositors claiming their rightful assets, but employees of the state appropriating state assets.' And they grabbed everything that was 'fungible.' (From the wreckage Solnick himself plucked a valuable book.)
A rigorous account of how the Soviet system fell apart. Using three different Soviet youth organizations as examples--the Komsomol, military conscription, and the job assignment program--Solnick illustrates how Mikhail Gorbachev's reforms rechanneled the self-seeking behavior of bureaucrats in directions that destroyed rather than revived soviet institutions. He bases his compact and accessible explanation on recent general institutional theory. Seen from this angle, structures collapsed not because ideology failed, politicians quarreled, or interested groups rose to challenge sterile authority. Instead, the system imploded because bureaucrats at all levels made off with state assets at the first opportunity, hollowing out the state or 'stealing' it...[The book's] underlying argument will fascinate most.
Solnick addresses one of the most important questions about the breakdown of the Soviet Union: Why did seemingly stable Soviet institutions disintegrate so rapidly during Gorbachev's reforms? In constructing his answer, Solnick uses a neo-institutional conceptual framework, which focuses the analysis on authority structures of institutions and incentives for individual bureaucratic actors. This is an original, richly documented and engagingly written study that reconceptualizes our understanding of major elements of the Soviet collapse.
Solnick makes a strong case for taking seriously the role that the collapse of institutions internally played in the overall collapse of the Soviet Union. Stealing the State is a major contribution to our understanding of one of the great events of the twentieth century.
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Bowker Data Service Summary
By incorporating theories of institutions into a political theory of Soviet breakdown and collapse, Solnick offers us a powerful and dynamic account of the most important political event of the later 20th century.
Main Description
What led to the breakdown of the Soviet Union? Steven Solnick argues, contrary to most current literature, that the Soviet system did not fall victim to stalemate at the top or to a revolution from below, but rather to opportunism from within. In three case studies--on the Communist Youth League, the system of job assignments for university graduates, and military conscription--Solnick makes use of rich archival sources and interviews to tell the story from a new perspective, and to employ and test Western theories of the firm in the Soviet environment. He finds that even before Gorbachev, mechanisms for controlling bureaucrats in Soviet organizations were weak, allowing these individuals great latitude in their actions. Once reforms began, they translated this latitude into open insubordination by seizing the very organizational assets they were supposed to be managing. Thus, the Soviet system, Solnick argues, suffered the organizational equivalent of a colossal bank run. When the servants of the state stopped obeying orders from above, the state's fate was sealed. By incorporating economic theories of institutions into a political theory of Soviet breakdown and collapse, Stealing the State offers a powerful and dynamic account of the most important international political event of the later twentieth century.
Table of Contents
Objectives of This Book
The Approach
The Basic Argument
Outline of the Book
Control and Collapse: Reformulating Traditional Approaches
A Framework for Analyzing Institutional and Policy Change
Power and Control in Soviet Institutions: "Traditional" Theories
Control and Collapse: Neoinstitutional Approaches
Neoinstitutional Approaches to Hierarchy
Explaining Institutional Change
Behavioral Theories: "What's So Neo about Neoinstitutionalism?
Testing Theories of Institutional Change: The Soviet Youth Program
A Strategy for Hypothesis Testing
Comrades and Sons: Generational Conflict and Soviet Policy
The Communist Youth League
Institutional Dynamics within the Komsomol
Crisis and Collapse of the All- Union Komsomol
Job Assignments for University Graduates
Institutional Dynamics of Raspredelenie
The Collapse of the Job Assignments System
Universal Military Service
Institutional Dynamics of Conscription Policy
Crisis and Breakdown of the Conscription System
The Breakdown of Hierarchy: Comparative Perspectives
Reviewing the Case Study Evidence
Additional Manifestations of Soviet Institutional Breakdown
Chinese Reforms: Successful Decentralization
Conclusions and Extensions: Control and Collapse in Hierarchies
Hierarchical Control and Collapse in Non-Communist Environments
After the Collapse: institutions in the Post-Communist States
Data Sources
Glossary and Abbreviations
Table of Contents provided by Publisher. All Rights Reserved.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem