Catalogue

COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

Between the queen and the cabby : Olympe de Gouges's Rights of woman /
John R. Cole.
imprint
Montréal : McGill-Queen's University Press, c2011.
description
311 p. : ill., facsim. ; 24 cm.
ISBN
0773538860 (Cloth), 9780773538863 (Cloth)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Montréal : McGill-Queen's University Press, c2011.
isbn
0773538860 (Cloth)
9780773538863 (Cloth)
general note
Text includes a translation of: Droits de la femme.
catalogue key
7779465
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. [285]-306) and index.
A Look Inside
Reviews
Review Quotes
"This is a beautifully written book. Gouges is a difficult person to get a firm grip on, but Cole's handling is agile. In fact, watching Gouges and Cole interact, one boldly announcing radical ideas and the other gracefully setting the scene around her - both, at times, with a sense of humor - is one of the greatest pleasures readers will enjoy." H-Net
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Summaries
Bowker Data Service Summary
In 'Between the Queen and the Cabby', John Cole provides the first full translation of de Gouges' 'Rights of Woman' and the first systematic commentary on its declaration, its attempt to envision a non-marital partnership agreement and its support for persons of colour.
Main Description
In Between the Queen and the Cabby, John Cole provides the first full translation of de Gouges's Rights of Woman and the first systematic commentary on its declaration, its attempt to envision a non-marital partnership agreement, and its support for persons of colour. Cole compares and contrasts de Gouges's two texts, explaining how the original text was both her model and her foil. By adding a proposed marriage contract to her pamphlet, she sought to turn the ideas of the French Revolution into a concrete way of life for women. Further examination of her work as a playwright suggests that she supported equality not only for women but for slaves as well. Cole highlights the historical context of de Gouges's writing, going beyond the inherent sexism and misogyny of the time in exploring why her work did not receive the reaction or achieve the influential status she had hoped for. Read in isolation in the gender-conscious twenty-first century, de Gouges's Rights of Woman may seem ordinary. However, none of her contemporaries, neither the Marquis de Condorcet nor Mary Wollstonecraft, published more widely on current affairs, so boldly attempted to extend democratic principles to women, or so clearly related the public and private spheres. Read in light of her eventual condemnation by the Revolutionary Tribunal, her words become tragically foresighted: "Woman has the right to mount the Scaffold; she must also have that of mounting the Rostrum."
Main Description
Students of the French Revolution and of women's right are generally familiar with Olympe de Gouges's bold adaptation of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen . However, her Rights of Woman has usually been extracted from its literary context and studied without proper attention to the political consequences of 1791.In Between the Queen and the Cabby , John Cole provides the first full translation of de Gouges's Rights of Woman and the first systematic commentary on its declaration, its attempt to envision a non-marital partnership agreement, and its support for persons of colour. Cole compares and contrasts de Gouges's two texts, explaining how the original text was both her model and her foil. By adding a proposed marriage contract to her pamphlet, she sought to turn the ideas of the French Revolution into a concrete way of life for women. Further examination of her work as a playwright suggests that she supported equality not only for women but for slaves as well. Cole highlights the historical context of de Gouges's writing, going beyond the inherent sexism and misogyny of the time in exploring why her work did not receive the reaction or achieve the influential status she had hoped for.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem