Quality improvement in women's health care.
Washington, DC : American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, c2000.
v, 87 p. : ill.
0915473631 (pbk.), 9780915473632 (pbk.)
More Details
Washington, DC : American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, c2000.
0915473631 (pbk.)
9780915473632 (pbk.)
general note
Prepared by the Committee on Quality Assessment of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Rev. ed. of: Quality assessment and improvement in obstetrics and gynecology. 1994 ed.
catalogue key
Includes bibliographical references (p. 71-72).
A Look Inside
Table of Contents
Developing a Departmental Quality Improvement Programp. 1
Assessing Clinical Competencep. 19
Granting Privilegesp. 19
Request for New Privilegesp. 30
ACOG Screening Toolsp. 31
Cesarean Delivery for Failure to Progressp. 33
Cesarean Delivery for Nonreassuring Fetal Statusp. 35
External Cephalic Versionp. 37
Hospitalization for Preeclampsiap. 39
Postterm Pregnancyp. 41
Repeat Cesarean Deliveryp. 43
Abdominal Hysterectomy with or without Adnexectomy for Endometriosisp. 45
Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Acute Pelvic Painp. 47
Ectopic Pregnancy, Rupturedp. 49
Endometrial Ablationp. 51
Female Sterilization by Tubal Interruptionp. 53
Hysterectomy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Premenopausal Womenp. 55
Hysterectomy for Leiomyomatap. 57
Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapsep. 59
Hysterectomy Performed for Chronic Pelvic Pain in the Absence of Significant Pathologyp. 61
Hysteroscopy for Abnormal Uterine Bleedingp. 63
Myomectomyp. 65
Surgery for Genuine Stress Urinary Incontinencep. 67
Glossaryp. 69
Referencesp. 71
Sample Data Collection Form: Department Gynecology Statisticsp. 75
Sample Data Collection Form: Department Obstetric Statisticsp. 76
The Assistant Number 4: Informed Consentp. 78
The Assistant Number 5: Informed Consent Formsp. 82
The Assistant Number 10: Risk Management in the Hospital Settingp. 84
Table of Contents provided by Blackwell. All Rights Reserved.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem