Catalogue


German romanticism and science : the procreative poetics of Goethe, Novalis, and Ritter /
Jocelyn Holland.
imprint
New York : Routledge, 2009.
description
221 p.
ISBN
0415993261 (hbk.), 9780415993265 (hbk.)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
New York : Routledge, 2009.
isbn
0415993261 (hbk.)
9780415993265 (hbk.)
catalogue key
6810735
 
Includes bibliographical references and index.
A Look Inside
Reviews
Review Quotes
"Holland's insightful and compelling account brings alive some important debates in Romantic science, illuminating a fascinating chapter in the history of vitalism and materialism alike." Paul Bishop, University of Glasgow, UK, Modern Language Review
This item was reviewed in:
Reference & Research Book News, August 2009
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Summaries
Back Cover Copy
Situated at the intersection of literature and science, Holland's study draws upon a diverse corpus of literary and scientific texts which testify to a cultural fascination with procreation around 1800. Through readings which range from Goethe's writing on metamorphosis to Novalis's aphorisms and novels and Ritter's Fragments from the Estate of a Young Physicist, Holland proposes that each author contributes to a scientifically-informed poetics of procreation. Rather than subscribing to a single biological theory (such as epigenesis or preformation), these authors take their inspiration from a wide inventory of procreative motifs and imagery.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Poetic Procreation and GoetheG++s Theory of Metamorphosis
Friedrich von Hardenberg and the Discourse of Procreation
The Poet as Artisan and the Instruments of Procreation
Johann Wilhelm Ritter and the Writing of Life
Procreative Thinking - Scientific Projects
Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Table of Contents provided by Publisher. All Rights Reserved.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem