We are what we mourn : the contemporary English-Canadian elegy /
Priscila Uppal.
Montréal : McGill-Queen's University Press, c2009.
viii, 312 p.
More Details
Montréal : McGill-Queen's University Press, c2009.
catalogue key
Includes bibliographical references (p. [277]-294) and index.
A Look Inside
Review Quotes
"Uppal brings the critical acumen of a writer of poetry and fiction herself to imaginative and insightful readings of poets as disparate as Milton Acorn and Anne Carson and as relatively similar as Patrick Lane and Al Purdy.We Are What We Mournbrings provocative critical shape to an important body of work." Leslie Monkman, Queen's University, Ontario
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Main Description
Why are so many contemporary poets writing elegies? Given a century shaped by two world wars, vast population displacements, and shifting attitudes towards aging and death, is the elegy form adaptable to the changing needs of writers and audiences? In a sceptical age, where can consolation be found? InWe Are What We MournPriscila Uppal examines why and how the work of mourning has drastically changed in the latter half of the twentieth century, focusing on the strong pattern in contemporary English-Canadian elegy that emphasizes connection rather than separation between the living and the dead. Uppal offers a penetrating reading of Canadian elegies that radically challenges English and American elegy traditions as well as long-standing psychological models for successful mourning. She sets up useful categories for elegy study - parental elegies, elegies for places, and elegies for cultural losses and displacements - and suggests where elegy and mourning studies might be headed post 9/11. The first book on the Canadian poetic elegy,We Are What We Mournchallenges all previous ideas about the purpose of mourning and will intrigue anyone interested in how mourning shapes cultural identity.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem