Catalogue

COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

Southern comfort : the Garden District of New Orleans, 1800-1900 /
S. Frederick Starr ; photographs by Robert S. Brantley.
imprint
Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, c1989.
description
xi, 308 p. : ill. ; 27 cm.
ISBN
0262192837
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
added author
imprint
Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, c1989.
isbn
0262192837
general note
Includes index.
catalogue key
659354
 
Bibliography: p. 296-301.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1990-05:
Starr describes the Garden District of New Orleans as "an unparalleled museum for the study of 19th-century architecture and society." He analyzes the causes of the Garden District's emergence as a distinctive and largely homogeneous suburb in the antebellum years, the networks of trade its self-made entrepreneurial elite established, and the houses that proclaimed their owners' status. The author examines the interrelationship of architects, patrons, and builders as well as that of masters, servants, and slaves; the District's ethnic composition and Whig political culture; and gender roles within the home. Ironically, in the post-Civil War years, when a new mythology began to romanticize the Garden District, its architecture became less homogeneous and less noticeably regional or local. Paralleling the breakdown of an older sense of community, new residences were flamboyant, aggressively individualistic, withdrawn from the street. Based upon such records as Notarial Archives, tax rolls, census data, and court records, as well as generations of scholarship, Southern Comfort combines architectural and social history in a creative, persuasive way. Highly recommended. -D. Schuyler, Franklin and Marshall College
Reviews
This item was reviewed in:
SciTech Book News,
Choice, May 1990
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem