Catalogue


The proposed fissile-material production cutoff : next steps /
Brian G. Chow, Richard H. Speier, Gregory S. Jones.
imprint
Santa Monica, CA : Rand, 1995.
description
xv, 51 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.
ISBN
0833023594
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Santa Monica, CA : Rand, 1995.
isbn
0833023594
general note
"National Defense Research Institute."
"Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense."
catalogue key
552000
 
Includes bibliographical references.
A Look Inside
Summaries
Main Description
President Clinton has announced that the United States will take a comprehensive approach to the growing global accumulation of fissile material. As an element to that approach, he proposed a multilateral convention banning production of such material for nuclear-explosives purposes or outside international safeguards. This report examines and proposes some next steps to the proposed convention, to further strengthen worldwide control of weapon-usable material.
Table of Contents
Preface
Figures and Table
Summary
Acknowledgments
Introductionp. 1
The U.S. Proposalp. 3
Scopep. 4
Reactionsp. 7
Third World Inventories and Ability to Produce Weapon-Usable Materialp. 9
Inventoriesp. 9
Production Capabilitiesp. 13
Proliferation Risks and Possible Controlsp. 16
The Proposed Convention's Effect on Proliferationp. 19
Effects on Specific Countriesp. 19
General Effects on Access to Weapon-Usable Materialp. 21
The Timeline for Negotiationsp. 23
Next Steps: Options, Obstacles, and Mitigating Measuresp. 25
Two Promising Optionsp. 25
Stockpile Dispositionp. 25
Total Cutoffp. 27
Obstaclesp. 28
Naval Reactorsp. 28
Delayed Effectivenessp. 28
Government Attitudesp. 29
Mitigating the Obstaclesp. 32
A Discriminatory Optionp. 35
Elements of a Comprehensive Approachp. 37
Conclusionp. 39
Estimates of Third World Countries' Inventories and Ability to Produce Weapon-Usable Materialp. 43
Table of Contents provided by Blackwell. All Rights Reserved.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem