Catalogue


Die Unruhe des Anfangs : Hegel und Husserl über den Weg in die Phänomenologie /
Tanja Stähler.
imprint
Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, c2003.
description
viii, 259 p. ; 25 cm.
ISBN
140201547X (alk. paper)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
series title
imprint
Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, c2003.
isbn
140201547X (alk. paper)
catalogue key
5247668
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. [247]-253) and index.
A Look Inside
Summaries
Main Description
How do we begin to philosophize? What are the main features of natural, prephilosophical consciousness, and what is its relation to philosophical consciousness? This study investigates the answers given to these questions in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit and in Husserl's phenomenology.
Unpaid Annotation
How do we begin to philosophize? What are the main features ofnatural, prephilosophical consciousness, and what is its relation tophilosophical consciousness? This study investigates the answers givento these questions in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit and in Husserl'sphenomenology.Husserl stresses that the transition to philosophy is not a continuousone, but requires something like a leap. Hegel underlines thatentering into philosophy has the character of a path. In spite of thisdifference in emphasis, there is a discontinuous as well as adevelopmental aspect of such a transition in each of the twophilosophers. Husserl, in his later philosophy, moves closer toHegel's position when he develops a historical introduction tophenomenology. Although both philosophers view history as ateleological process, an important difference remains: For Hegel, history can be completed; for Husserl, it is an open, unendingprocess. The diverging concepts of history go hand in hand withdifferent ideas as to phenomenological method and the role ofphilosopher.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem