COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

To assure pride and confidence in the electoral process /
report of the National Commission on Federal Election Reform ; Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford ... [et al.], co-chairs ; Philip Zelikow, executive director.
Washington, D.C. : Brookings Institution Press, c2002.
358 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
0815706316 (paper : alk. paper)
More Details
Washington, D.C. : Brookings Institution Press, c2002.
0815706316 (paper : alk. paper)
general note
"Organized by Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia, the Century Foundation."
catalogue key
technical details
Also available via the Internet from the Commission's web site (PDF version).
Includes bibliographical references.
A Look Inside
First Chapter

Summary of

Principal Recommendations

The Goals of Federal Election Reform

When they choose the president, the vice president, and members of Congress, the American people should expect all levels of government to provide a democratic process that:

* Maintains an accurate list of citizens who are qualified to vote;

* Encourages every eligible voter to participate effectively;

* Uses equipment that reliably clarifies and registers the voter's choices;

* Handles close elections in a foreseeable and fair way;

* Operates with equal effectiveness for every citizen and every community; and

* Reflects limited but responsible federal participation.

For Americans, democracy is a precious birthright. But each generation must nourish and improve the processes of democracy for its successors. In the near-term, the next three to five years for instance, we envision a country where each state maintains accurate, computerized lists of who can vote, networked with local administrators. Using that system, qualified voters in our mobile society would be able to vote throughout their state without being turned away because of the vagaries of local administration. Using the system we recommend here, millions of military and other overseas voters would find it easier to get and return their ballots. Election Day would be held on a national holiday, freeing up more people to serve as poll workers and making polling places more accessible. Voting machines would meet a common standard of excellent performance. Each state would have its uniform, objective definitions of what constitutes a vote. News organizations would exert necessary restraint in predicting election outcomes. Every jurisdiction and every official would obey the Voting Rights Act and other statutes that secure the franchise and prohibit discrimination. In all of this there would be a delicate balance of shared responsibilities between levels of government, and between officials and the voters they serve.

This report sets forth our recommendations for the next, immediate steps on the road to attainment of these goals.


Every state should adopt a system of statewide voter registration.

1. The statewide computerized voter file should be networked with and accessible to every election jurisdiction in the state so that any level can initiate registrations and updates with prompt notification to the others. It should include provisions for sharing data with other states.

2. When a citizen either applies for a driver's license or registers to vote, each state should obtain residential address and other information, such as a digitized signature, in a form that is equally usable for both the motor vehicle and voter databases. The address information can then be linked to a statewide street index.

3. Each state's driver's license and voter registration applications should require applicants to provide at least the last four digits of their Social Security number. States should also ask applicants if they are registered in another state, so that that state can be notified of the new registration.

4. Each state's voter registration applications should require a separate and specific affirmation that the applicant is a U.S. citizen.


Every state should permit provisional voting by any voter who claims to be qualified to vote in that state.

1. Provisional voting authorizes any person whose name does not appear on the list of registered voters, but who wishes to vote, to be issued a ballot. The ballot shall be counted only upon verification by election officials that the provisional voter is eligible and qualified to vote within the state and only for the offices for which the voter is qualified to vote.

2. Another option, for states with statewide computerized voting lists, would be to let a voter who is not on the list submit proof of identification and swear to or affirm an appropriate affidavit of eligibility to vote in that jurisdiction. This information could then be used as an application for voter registration and the voter list would be amended accordingly. If qualified, the voter could either be issued a regular ballot or, if the state preferred, be allowed to vote provisionally pending confirmation of the voter's eligibility.


Congress should enact legislation to hold presidential and congressional elections on a national holiday.

1. Holding national elections on a national holiday will increase availability of poll workers and suitable polling places and might make voting easier for some workers.

2. One approach, which this Commission favors, would be to specify that in even-numbered years the Veterans Day national holiday be held on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November and serve also as our Election Day.


Congress should adopt legislation that simplifies and facilitates absentee voting by uniformed and overseas citizens.

1. Each state should designate a responsible official for absentee voting by uniformed and overseas citizens who are residents of that state. That official should become the single point of contact for the citizens of that state who are served by the Federal Voting Assistance Program, which helps such uniformed and overseas citizens.

2. In 1986 Congress passed the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) to help eligible members of the armed services and their families, and other citizens overseas, to vote. Utilizing standardized forms for voter registration and absentee ballot requests, all UOCAVA-covered residents from a home state should be authorized to mail these applications to the designated official for their state. If that state uses a statewide voter registration system networked to local jurisdictions, as we have recommended, the state official should be authorized to act directly on these applications or to forward them for action by the appropriate local jurisdiction. States should accept one absentee ballot application as a valid application for all subsequent elections being held by that state in that year.

3. The designated state official should be authorized to accept either a voted ballot being returned for any jurisdiction of that state or a standardized Federal Write-In Absentee Ballot that is an option for a UOCAVA-covered citizen. States should be obliged to accept and tally a Federal Write-In Absentee Ballot for those contests in which they determine the voter was eligible to vote.

4. Properly filed absentee ballots should be accepted if they have been received by the time the polls of that state have closed on Election Day. States and the Federal Voting Assistance Program should develop common standards for validation of ballots that have been voted and mailed on or before Election Day, even if they are received after that date.


Each state should allow for restoration of voting rights to otherwise eligible citizens who have been convicted of a felony once they have fully served their sentence, including any term of probation or parole.


The state and federal governments should take additional steps to assure the voting rights of all citizens and to enforce the principle of one person, one vote.

1. Federal and state governments should intensify efforts to enforce compliance with the several statutes guaranteeing the right to vote and prohibiting various forms of discrimination in voting and registration.

2. The methods for funding and administering elections-from investments in equipment through voter education to procedures at the polling place-should seek to ensure that every qualified citizen has an equal opportunity to vote and that every individual's vote is equally effective. No individual, group, or community should be left with a justified belief that the electoral process works less well for some than for others.

3. Federal and state governments should consider uses of technology, for example when developing voting equipment system standards, that will make it feasible to provide greater assistance to language minorities.


Each state should set a benchmark for voting system performance, uniform in each local jurisdiction that conducts elections. The benchmark should be expressed as a percentage of residual vote (the combination of overvotes, spoiled votes, and undervotes) in the contest at the top of the ballot and should take account of deliberate decisions of voters not to make a choice.

1. Benchmarks should consider the results obtained by best practices within that state, taking local circumstances into account. In general, we suggest that the benchmarks in the next election cycle should be set no higher than 2%, with the goal of further reductions in succeeding cycles.

2. Each state should require its election jurisdictions to issue a public report on the number of residual votes after every statewide election, including the probable causes of error, if any.

3. Each state should determine for itself how to hold its election jurisdictions accountable for achieving the benchmarks.


The federal government should develop a comprehensive set of voting equipment system standards for the benefit of state and local election administration.

1. Congress should grant statutory authority to an appropriate federal agency to develop such standards in consultation with state and local election officials.

2. The scope of the voting system standards should include security (including a documentary audit for non-ballot systems), procedures for decertification as well as certification of both software and hardware, assessment of human usability, and operational guidelines for proper use and maintenance of the equipment. The agency should maintain a clearinghouse of information about experience in practice.

3. Voters should have the opportunity to correct errors at the precinct or other polling place, either within the voting equipment itself or in the operational guidelines to administrators for using the equipment.

4. Each voting tally system certified for use should include, as part of the certification, a proposed statement of what constitutes a proper vote in the design and operation of the system.

5. New voting equipment systems certified either by the federal government or by any state should provide a practical and effective means for voters with physical disabilities to cast a secret ballot.

6. In addition to developing the voting system standards, the federal agency should provide its own certification and decertification of hardware and software, including components in voter registration systems. These federal certifications and decertifications, like the remainder of the standards, will be recommendations to states which they can adopt or not.

7. This federal service should include selection and oversight of a federally supervised set of independent testing authorities who will apply the standards in assessing equipment. After the federal agency develops and approves the relevant voluntary voting system standards in consultation with state and local administrators, this further, technical task should be delegated to the highly regarded and relatively independent National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of the Department of Commerce.


Each state should adopt uniform statewide standards for defining what will constitute a vote on each category of voting equipment certified for use in that state. Statewide recount, election certification, and contest procedures should take account of the timelines for selection of presidential electors.

1. Statewide standards for defining a vote in advance of an election should be uniform and as objective as possible.

2. Each state should reevaluate its election code to consider adopting a predictable sequence of: a) vote tabulation and retabulation; b) machine or manual recounts to encompass the entire jurisdiction of the office being recounted, triggered by whatever threshold the state may choose; c) certification of a final count; followed then by d) contests of the certification limited to allegations of fraud or other misconduct.

3. In such a sequence, each state should allow at least 21 days before requiring certification of the final count. But we recommend retention of a federal deadline under which the "safe harbor" for conclusive state determination of presidential electors will expire.

4. Each state should also develop a uniform design for the federal portion of the state ballot, for use in each of that state's certified voting equipment systems.


Excerpted from To Assure Pride and Confidence in the Electoral Process by Jimmy Carter Gerald R. Ford Lloyd N. Cutler Robert H. Michel Copyright © 2002 by Brookings Institution Press
Excerpted by permission. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.

Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 2003-03-01:
Although this volume's principal purpose is to deliver and explain the National Commission on Federal Election Reform's 13 recommendations for improving voting participation and election administration, it is the well-researched appendixes that provide the most value for scholars. Almost one-third of the book is devoted to the Task Force on the Federal Election System's report. Coordinated by John Mark Hansen, it assembles and synthesizes the key aspects of each state's electoral system and the chief consequences flowing from the current structure. Its 35 tables, each clearly constructed and lucidly presented, include some real gems, especially in detailing registration requirements and absentee voting procedures. Another one-third covers constitutional and federal electoral law, giving an up-to-date legal perspective on the key issues. Given the US's dismal performance on voting turnout and its Florida-spotlighted problems with accurate counting, this volume is recommended for all libraries. ^BSumming Up: Highly recommended. All levels. E. T. Jones University of Missouri--St. Louis
Review Quotes
"[The book's] 35 tables, each clearly constructed and lucidly presented, include some real gems, especially in detailing registration requirements and absentee voting procedures." --E.T. Jones, University of Missouri- St. Louis, Choice, 3/1/2003
"This report makes fascinating reading for those with deep concerns about the state of the American electoral process. It provides useful data, clear summaries and recommendations and 'concurring' and 'dissenting' opinions as clues to philosophical divisions within the commission itself." --Niall Palmer, Brunel University, Political Studies Review
This item was reviewed in:
Reference & Research Book News, November 2002
Choice, March 2003
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Main Description
In 2000 the American electoral system was tested by a political ordeal unlike any in living memory. Not since 1876-77 has the outcome of a national election remained so unsettled for so long. The past election¡¯s recount conundrum shook the nation¡¯s faith in the mechanisms that support the democratic process. Led by former Presidents Ford and Carter, the National Commission on Federal Election Reform undertook a study of the American electoral system. The resulting report describes where and what went wrong during the 2000 election, and makes clear and specific recommendations for reform, directed at state government, Congress, news organizations, and others. This volume also includes the full text of the Task Force Reports from the Commission.
Publisher Fact Sheet
Led by former Presidents Ford and Carter, the National Commission on Federal Election Reform commissioned a study of the American electoral system after the 2000 presidential election. This book describes where and what went wrong during last year's presidential election, making clear recommendations for reform which are directed at state government, Congress, and news organizations.
Unpaid Annotation
In 2000 the American electoral system was tested by a political ordeal unlike any in living memory. Not since 1876-77 has the outcome of a national election remained so unsettled for so long. The past election's recount conundrum shook the nation's faith in the mechanisms that support the democratic process. Led by former Presidents Ford and Carter, the National Commission on Federal Election Reform undertook a study of the American electoral system. The resulting report describes where and what went wrong during the 2000 election, and makes clear and specific recommendations for reform, directed at state government, Congress, news organizations, and others. This volume also includes the full text of the Task Force Reports from the Commission.
Table of Contents
Letter to the American Peoplep. 1
Preface to the Reportp. 3
Summary of Principal Recommendationsp. 5
The Goals of Federal Election Reformp. 17
The Federal Government and the Federal Election Systemp. 21
The Constitution's Allocation of Authorityp. 21
Presidential Elections and the Electoral Collegep. 22
The Primary Role of State Governmentsp. 23
A Democratic Process That Maintains an Accurate List of Citizens Who Are Qualified to Votep. 25
The Problem of Accurate Voter Listsp. 25
Voter Registration, Past and Presentp. 26
A Better Way: Statewide Voter Registration Systemsp. 28
A Democratic Process That Encourages Every Eligible Voter to Participate Effectivelyp. 33
Provisional Votingp. 34
"Same Day" Registration?p. 37
Improving Voter Participationp. 38
Election Day Holidayp. 39
Military and Overseas Votingp. 42
Early, Remote, and Internet Votingp. 43
Citizens with Criminal Recordsp. 45
Ensuring the Voting Rights of All Citizensp. 46
A Democratic Process That Uses Equipment That Reliably Clarifies and Registers the Voter's Choicesp. 51
Very Close Elections Happen--Oftenp. 52
Benchmarks, Not Mandatesp. 52
Benchmarks Applied--The Forty Most Populous Countiesp. 55
Standards for More Effective and Accessible Voting Technologyp. 57
A Democratic Process That Handles Close Elections in a Foreseeable and Fair Wayp. 61
Objective Vote Definitions and Foreseeable Post-Election Proceduresp. 61
Media Projections of Election Resultsp. 64
A Democratic Process That Reflects Limited but Responsible Federal Participationp. 69
A Pattern of Neglectp. 69
Estimating and Allocating the Costs of Improvementp. 70
The Federal Institutional Rolep. 73
Structuring Federal Legislation and Financial Assistancep. 74
Endnotes to the Reportp. 77
Additional Statementsp. 85
Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part, by Christopher Edley, Joined by Leon Panetta, Deval Patrick, Bill Richardson, John Seigenthaler, and Kathleen Sullivanp. 85
Concurring by Colleen C. McAndrews, Joined by Slade Gorton and Leon Panettap. 90
Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part, by John Seigenthaler, Joined in Part by Griffin Bellp. 92
Organizationp. 96
About the National Commission on Federal Election Reformp. 96
Organizing and Sponsoring Institutionsp. 103
Contributors to the Commission's Workp. 105
The Michigan Qualified Voter File: A Brief Introductionp. 113
Task Force on the Federal Election Systemp. 119
Prefacep. 120
Sizing the Problemp. 121
Voter Registrationp. 130
Statewide Voter Registration Systemsp. 151
Civic Education Programsp. 157
Early Voting, Unrestricted Absentee Voting, and Voting by Mailp. 163
Verification of Identityp. 180
Provisional Ballotingp. 186
Disfranchisement of Felonsp. 195
Uniform Poll Closing and Reportingp. 201
Task Force on Constitutional and Federal Election Lawp. 217
Prefacep. 219
Federal Regulation of Electionsp. 220
What Counts as a Vote?p. 339
Recounts and Contestsp. 343
Congressional Authority to Regulate When Votes Can Be Countedp. 354
Table of Contents provided by Syndetics. All Rights Reserved.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem