Catalogue


Steinfachwerk in Pompeji : Bautechnik und Architektur /
Kees Peterse ; mit einem Beitrag von Ineke Joosten
imprint
Amsterdam : J.C. Gieben, 1999.
description
xi, 182, [21] p., [77] leaves of plates : ill. ; 25 cm.
ISBN
9050631185
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
added author
series title
imprint
Amsterdam : J.C. Gieben, 1999.
isbn
9050631185
catalogue key
3854885
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. 157-160)
A Look Inside
Summaries
Main Description
The oldest still visible traces of domestic architecture in Pompeji show two construction techniques: opus quadratum (ashlar masonry) and opus africanum (limestone framework). These techniques were applied together in the same building, each for a specific purpose. Whereas ashlar masonry was always used in a consistent manner, the walls of limestone framework display a greater variety, which can be classified on the basis of construction techniques. This research has taken also into account the composition of the clay mortar which is typical for this period. After a relative chronology was established the evolution of early domestic architecture was traced through various stages of development. The best known example of domestic architecture from this early period is the House of the Surgeon, which was one of a small group of houses for the elite of that time. Most li-mestone framework houses from the period are decidedly smaller and occur in two different types, probably meant for the middle class. The first type displays the same general characteristics of the elite houses on a smaller scale. The other consists of a plan with standard layout and dimensions. These types, both the atrium houses of the elite and the standard small houses do not represent the beginning of a development, but an advanced stage, which is documented in Pompeii from the beginning of the fourth century BC.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem