Catalogue

COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

Women and the economy : a comparative study of Britain and the USA /
A.T. Mallier and M.J. Rosser ; foreword by Baroness Seear.
imprint
New York : St. Martin's Press, 1987.
description
xiv, 221 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.
ISBN
0312887329 :
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
added author
imprint
New York : St. Martin's Press, 1987.
isbn
0312887329 :
general note
Includes indexes.
catalogue key
3464351
 
Bibliography: p. 200-211.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1987-06:
Mallier and Rosser (Coventry Polytechnic, UK) analyzed 1980 US and 1981 British decennial census data to consider and compare economic analyses and explanations of the changes in the female labor force. The authors report on economic research on women and the economy-research in which theoretical models were tested against statistical evidence. Reviewed and compared is research on the supply of and demand for female labor as well as research on part-time employment, unemployment, and the effects of new technologies on female employment in the US and Britain. Although the US and Britain are the focus of the book, international comparisons are made between them and other free-market industrialized nations and the Soviet Union. The concluding chapter, ``A Marxian Perspective,'' seems tacked on and is the only chapter without statistical data. The basis for comparisons are provided in 49 tables and 34 figures. Twelve pages of excellent references and selected bibliography include standard works such as Gary Stanley Becker's Human Capital (CH, Mar '76; 2nd ed., 1980) and definitive research by authors such as J.J. Heckman. College and university collections.-M. Talafuse, formerly Ball State University
Reviews
This item was reviewed in:
Choice, June 1987
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem