Catalogue

COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

Confidence regained : economics, Mrs. Thatcher, and the British voter /
Helmut Norpoth.
imprint
Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, c1992.
description
x, 229 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
ISBN
0472103334 (alk. paper)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, c1992.
isbn
0472103334 (alk. paper)
catalogue key
3337618
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. 217-224) and index.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1992-12:
Using survey data about the three British general elections between 1979 and 1987, Norpoth, a political scientist at SUNY, examines the effect of economic policies on voting choices. The author discusses the premises of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's economic policies, and the responsibility of those policies for the performance of the British economy in the 1980s. In separate chapters devoted to the three elections and to the attitudes of voters to the three main parties, Norpoth analyzes the degree to which voting and opinions between elections are related to economic issues. His general answer, though qualified, is that perceptions of the Thatcher government's handling of economic issues, especially inflation and unemployment, did influence voters, although other issues, such as the Falklands War, were also important. Thatcher's emphasis on free enterprise over socialism helped keep her in power. The author concludes that Thatcher did much to restore confidence in her Conservative party's ability to achieve key economic goals. The book will interest specialists in British politics and more generally those studying the interaction of economic policies and politics. M. Curtis; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
Reviews
This item was reviewed in:
Choice, December 1992
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem