COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

Thomas Joplin and classical macroeconomics : a re-appraisal of classical monetary thought /
by D.P. O'Brien.
Aldershot, Hants., England ; Brookfield, Vt. : E. Elgar Pub., c1993.
xiv, 289 p.
1852786760 :
More Details
Aldershot, Hants., England ; Brookfield, Vt. : E. Elgar Pub., c1993.
1852786760 :
catalogue key
Includes bibliographical references.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1993-10:
O'Brien (Univ. of Durham) has written and edited several books on the history of economic thought; in this volume he studies the life of Thomas Joplin (1790-1847) and his contribution to monetary economics. The book is divided into six parts. The first part discusses Joplin's life as a banker and banking reformer and his relationship with other economists of the day. The second part provides an overall view of the macroeconomic model implied by Joplin's writings. The third part discusses his views on structure, competition, and regulation in banking, while the fourth part discusses Joplin's views on agricultural prices and the monetary system and international trade. The fifth part presents data, econometric tests, and a modern macroeconomic model based on Joplin's thought. Conclusions follow in Part 6. Although this book is generally accessible, those without some background in macroeconomics and British economic history will find it difficult. Most appropriate for upper-division undergraduates, graduate students, and researchers. R. Grossman; Wesleyan University
This item was reviewed in:
Choice, October 1993
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Main Description
O Brien has made a powerful, well-researched case for Joplin s theoretical predominance. Clive Belfield, History of Economic Thought This is not just a masterful book on a long-neglected monetary theorist and banking reformer of the 19th century but one that places both the subject and the age in an entirely different perspective. Joplin turns out to have been one of the greatest macroeconomists of the English school of Classical Political Economy and in reassessing him, O Brien has thrown an entirely new light on the received history of monetary theory. O Brien on McCulloch was good, but O'Brien on Joplin is breathtaking. Mark Blaug, University of London and University of Buckingham, UK This marvellous book is more than a re-evaluation of the work of a highly colourful monetary theorist, reformer and energetic controversialist. Other major landmarks, such as Robbins s Torrens and O Brien s own McCulloch, have produced significant changes in perceptions of their subjects. But this highly readable book places virtually the whole of classical monetary and macroeconomic thought in a new perspective. Not only is Joplin shown to have been highly original in his development of concepts a multiplier and a reciprocal demand approach to trade are just two examples but his ability to bring new concepts to bear on the most important practical issues of his time is nothing short of staggering. Joplin argued that the basis of nineteenth monetary legislation (resulting in the 1844 Bank Act) was fundamentally flawed, largely because of its focus (along with later commentators) on the Bank of England note issue rather than money supply originating outside the Bank of England. The author provides econometric tests of Joplin s theory and shows that Joplin s macroeconomic analysis can be formulated as a sophisticated dynamic Keynesian model of an open economy. Denis O Brien has brought to his subject a phenomenal range and depth of knowledge of economic literature in order to produce a major landmark in the history of economic analysis. John Creedy, University of Melbourne, Australia Denis O Brien has done something that I would have thought just about impossible, he s found new and important things to say about an episode in monetary theory that one would have thought has been thoroughly worked over by others. The book is going to be read by anyone interested in the development of monetary economics and by economic historians too. David Laidler, The University of Western Ontario, Canada O Brien s book goes a long way toward rectifying this neglect and restoring Joplin to his rightful place in the history of monetary thought. Thomas M. Humphrey, The Economic Journal O Brien s book not only provides a detailed analysis, but it brings his comprehensive knowledge of the literature to bear in convincingly arguing this case. After reading O Brien, students of monetary history, classical macroeconomics, and nineteenth century Britain may see the subject from an improved perspective. Charles F. Peake, Journal of the History of Economic Thought The book brings to life one of the economic exiles . Salim Rashid, Southern Economic Journal D.P. O Brien has written a splendid, lucid exposition of Joplin s economic doctrines. . . . It is an historical work of the first rank and could provide the basis for a fascinating study in the sociology of knowledge. . . . Any serious student of the history of monetary thought, macroeconomics, or banking policy should spend some time on Joplin. O Brien s book provides a wonderful informative guide. Kevin D. Hoover, Journal of Economic Literature No one doing work in this area will be able to ignore O Brien s thesis. Neil T. Skaggs, History of Political Economy
Table of Contents
Introductionp. 1
The banking reformer
Defence and disappointment
Joplin and his fellow economists
Income, expenditure and aggregate monetary demand
Problems of a paper currency
Monetary disequilibrium
The principle of metallic fluctuation
The structure of banking
Competition and regulation
Agricultural prices and the monetary system
Reciprocal demand
Methodology and the use of data
A formal Joplin model
Joplin's achievementp. 273
Indexp. 285
Table of Contents provided by Blackwell. All Rights Reserved.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem