Catalogue

COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

Bleep! censoring rock and rap music /
Betty Houchin Winfield and Sandra Davidson, editors.
imprint
Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 1999.
description
ix, 132 p. ; 25 cm.
ISBN
0313307059 (alk. paper)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 1999.
isbn
0313307059 (alk. paper)
general note
An outgrowth of a 1993 international conference on rock and rap music and the mass media, "On the Beat: Rock 'n' Rap, Mass Media and Society."
catalogue key
3053557
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. [115]-121) and index.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1999-12-01:
Winfield and Davidson have brought together nine succinct essays about attempts to control rock and rap music in a democratic society. The contributors chart the culture's reaction to the effect of minority music on US society. They compare the modern (1950s-90s) reaction to rock and rap to the US mainstream reaction to jazz, blues, and country music from the 1920s into the 1950s. The common theme of the book is that censorship is an inappropriate response to musical expressions of an oppressed minority's point of view. The essays look at various attempts to censor rock and rap music and discuss current court decrees and relevant legislation. Exceptions are duly noted for broadcasting and obscenity. Societal changes and upheavals provide the background from which most of the censorship arises. The essays present the arguments of the censors, but rarely in a favorable light. Nonetheless, the historical overview on obscenity law and cases is the most accurate and cogent summary of the issue this reviewer has read. The book's careful documentation (e.g., an eight-page essay on the FCC's struggle with Howard Stern includes 91 footnotes) and selected bibliography will be an excellent resource for those beginning a study of this issue. R. E. Sutton; American University
Reviews
Review Quotes
'œThe book's careful documentation and selected bibliography will be an excellent resource for those beginning a study of this issue.'' Choice-Humanities
'œThere is no doubt that the censorship of music is an important issue for media scholars to address.'' Journalism History
'œWhether one has interest in currently popular music or not, this book still makes interesting reading.'' Media Ehtics
This item was reviewed in:
Choice, December 1999
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Summaries
Bowker Data Service Summary
This text examines boundaries of artistic tolerance, and society's response to rock and rap music. Inhibitions and censoring, it is argued, stem from concerns for a healthy society and the impact of sexual explicitness on adolescents.
Long Description
Examining the various boundaries of American artistic tolerance, chapters address the societal and legal responses to rock and rap music. Artistic expression has historically clashed with mainstream views, resulting in apprehension acted upon internally and externally, especially when expression is aimed toward children or young adults. This work studies the mass media content and programming in network television, Rolling Stone magazine, and the New York TimeS≪/i> reviews and spot news concerning rock and rap music. The National Endowment for the Arts, the FCC, and the music industry's internal responses to parents and adults are discussed as well. Inhibitions and censoring, it is argued, stem from adult concerns for a healthy functioning society and from anxiety about the impact of sexual explicitness and uncontrolled behavioral expression on adolescents. This work attempts to explain why societal intolerance has a pattern of limiting the lyrics and sounds of rock and rap music. Uniquely combining both societal and legal viewpoints on censorship of America's popular music culture, these essays address issues of concern to various scholars including those studying mass media, censorship, and American popular culture. Legal appendices are included as useful references, such as the National Endowments for the Arts Obscenity and Rejections Sections.
Long Description
Examining the various boundaries of American artistic tolerance, chapters address the societal and legal responses to rock and rap music. Artistic expression has historically clashed with mainstream views, resulting in apprehension acted upon internally and externally, especially when expression is aimed toward children or young adults. This work studies the mass media content and programming in network television, Rolling Stone magazine, and the New York Times reviews and spot news concerning rock and rap music. The National Endowment for the Arts, the FCC, and the music industry's internal responses to parents and adults are discussed as well. Inhibitions and censoring, it is argued, stem from adult concerns for a healthy functioning society and from anxiety about the impact of sexual explicitness and uncontrolled behavioral expression on adolescents. This work attempts to explain why societal intolerance has a pattern of limiting the lyrics and sounds of rock and rap music. Uniquely combining both societal and legal viewpoints on censorship of America's popular music culture, these essays address issues of concern to various scholars including those studying mass media, censorship, and American popular culture. Legal appendices are included as useful references, such as the National Endowments for the Arts Obscenity and Rejections Sections.
Table of Contents
""Let Me Count the Ways"": Censoring Rock and Rap Music
Winfield From A Fine Romance to Good Rockin' - and Beyond: Look What They've Done to My Song, Ma
Because of the Children: Decades of Attempted Controls of Rock and Rap Music
Winfield Two Perspectives on Ice-T: ""Can't Touch Me"": Musical Messages and Incitement Law
The Politics of Aesthetic Response: Cultural Conservatism, the NEA and Ice-T
Stern Stuff: Here Comes the
Table of Contents provided by Publisher. All Rights Reserved.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem