Catalogue

COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

The political economy of poverty, equity, and growth : Malawi and Madagascar /
Frederic L. Pryor.
imprint
New York : Published for the World Bank [by] Oxford University Press, c1990.
description
xiv, 470 p. : map ; 24 cm. --
ISBN
0195208234
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
added author
imprint
New York : Published for the World Bank [by] Oxford University Press, c1990.
isbn
0195208234
catalogue key
2296335
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. 437-457) and index.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1991-07:
The World Bank has sponsored several comparative studies to "provide a critical evaluation of the economic history of selected developing countries in 1950-85." This, the first study in the series to be published, is important because not much scholarly work has been done on either of the two countries examined. Malawi and Madagascar are both low-income East African countries with similar populations. On the surface, Malawi is more of a market-driven economy, whereas Madagascar is more of a planned economy. Many of the African countries have poor quality basic statistics, and these two countries are no exception. In view of that, Pryor has done an admirable job of comparing and contrasting the two countries with respect to economic institutions, economic growth, agriculture, foreign trade and balance of payments, manufacturing and transportation, the government sector, and distribution of income. Perhaps the most innovative chapter in the book is the last, "Explorations in Political Economy." This "exercise in positive economics" richly deserves the attention of all students of economic development. -D. N. Sinha, Central State University (OK)
Reviews
This item was reviewed in:
Choice, July 1991
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem