Catalogue


Revolution and culture : the Bogdanov-Lenin controversy /
Zenovia A. Sochor.
imprint
Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 1988.
description
x, 258 p. : ill. --
ISBN
0801420881 (alk. paper)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 1988.
isbn
0801420881 (alk. paper)
general note
Includes index.
catalogue key
2133611
 
Bibliography: p. 235-251.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1988-11:
A scholarly work focused on the political-cultural ideas of Aleksander A. Bogdanov and Lenin's opposition to them. Sochor not only presents the ideas and conflict, but also argues for the significance of Bogdanov's thought. Bogdanov was, for example, a pioneer of systems thinking;the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci later espoused a number of beliefs similar to those of Bogdanov. Although several early critics charged, with some justification, that Bogdanov's ideas were obscure and difficult, his early debate with Lenin over culture has some relevance today. (For the significance of political culture, see Robert C. Tucker's valuable Political Culture and Leadership in Soviet Russia: From Lenin to Gorbachev, CH, Mar '88.) Now that Soviet leaders and historians are reexamining their history as never before and rehabilitating Communists such as Bukharin, Bogdanov's views seem more timely. Sochor believes, for example, that "Bukharin's thinking was closer to Bogdanovism than to Leninism." Footnotes, bibliography, and index. Graduate readership. -W. G. Moss, Eastern Michigan University
Reviews
This item was reviewed in:
Choice, November 1988
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem