Catalogue


Eisenhower and the Suez Crisis of 1956 /
Cole C. Kingseed.
imprint
Baton Rouge : Louisiana State University Press, c1995.
description
xii, 166 p. ; 24 cm.
ISBN
0807119873 (alk. paper)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Baton Rouge : Louisiana State University Press, c1995.
isbn
0807119873 (alk. paper)
catalogue key
1385365
 
Includes bibliographical references and index.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1996-03:
Using the Suez crisis of 1956 as a backdrop, Kingseed (US Military Academy) analyzes the leadership techniques and bureaucratic skills of President Eisenhower. The president triumphed diplomatically, forcing the British, French, and Israelis to cease their aggression while simultaneously preventing the Soviet Union from taking advantage of the crisis. Eisenhower succeeded because he had finely honed crisis-management skills. Drawing on his military training and his experience in overseeing Operation OVERLORD in 1944, Eisenhower employed a sequential planning process or "commander's estimate" that permitted him to assess logically his objectives and courses of action. He also organized his White House and his relations with military and legislative leaders to ensure that all aspects of strategic management coalesced at the presidential level. Kingseed agrees with "Eisenhower revisionists" like Stephen Ambrose, who portray Eisenhower as a decisive leader, but concedes that Eisenhower was unable to build on his victory because he viewed Middle Eastern developments through the prism of the Cold War, confusing anticolonialism and Arab nationalism with communism. Upper-division undergraduates and above. S. G. Rabe; University of Texas at Dallas
Reviews
This item was reviewed in:
Choice, March 1996
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem