Catalogue


Hester Thrale Piozzi, portrait of a literary woman /
William McCarthy.
imprint
Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press, c1985.
description
xiii, 306 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
ISBN
0807816590
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press, c1985.
isbn
0807816590
general note
Includes index.
catalogue key
1238006
 
Bibliography: p. [287]-296.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1986-10:
Hester Thrale Piozzi has been known to students of literary history as the capricious but devoted friend of Samuel Johnson, one of his chief bulwarks against melancholy. Such gentlemanly commonplaces are being subjected to increasing scrutiny by feminist scholars and students of women's history within a general revisionist project (in which men in some numbers are beginning to take part). McCarthy enters the lists as Piozzi's champion in order to rescue her works from neglect and her reputation as a writer from prejudiced disparagement. As a recovery operation, this literary biography mostly succeeds. Apt quotation of Piozzi's own colloquial and epigrammatic forcefulness will make readers seek out her writings. But as an interpretation of Piozzi as a (the?) representative neglected woman writer of the period, this study is at once too theoretically limited, too schematically and naively ``feminist,'' and too quirkily written to succeed as fully as one might wish. Relying heavily on Harold Bloom's theory of the anxieties of influence and the Bloomian feminist paradigm of Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar, McCarthy rather speculatively and reductively casts Piozzi as a rebellious parodist of Johnson and other male writers, her entire career fueled by that peculiar resentment that gender exclusions perpetuate. Rather too many of Piozzi's limitations as a poet and prose stylist are dismissed as the epiphenomena of gender inequalities. It is as if every shortcoming of a woman writer were explicable solely in terms of her sexually based marginalization by the literary establishment. Such simple explanations are historically reductive. We should be grateful for the scholarly energy of McCarthy's defense, without overlooking the consequences of his apologist's zeal.-D. Landry, University of Southern California
Reviews
This item was reviewed in:
Choice, October 1986
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem