Catalogue


Cosmetic surgery narratives [electronic resource] : a cross-cultural analysis of women's accounts /
Debra Gimlin.
imprint
Houndmills, Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
description
ix, 197 p. ; 23 cm.
ISBN
0230579388, 9780230579385
format(s)
Book
More Details
imprint
Houndmills, Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
isbn
0230579388
9780230579385
restrictions
Licensed for access by U. of T. users.
abstract
This title examines British and American women's narratives of cosmetic surgery, exploring what those narratives say about the contemporary status of cosmetic surgery and 'local' ideas about its legitimate and illegitimate uses.
catalogue key
12025764
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. 171-188) and index.
A Look Inside
Reviews
Review Quotes
'This meticulously researched book explores cosmetic surgery not only within national contexts but also across specific and local medical cultures, comparing public and private healthcare systems and how these affect the ways that patients account for their cosmetic surgery desires and experiences. The histories of professional bodies representing cosmetic surgeons are particularly insightful. Not only beautifully written, Cosmetic Surgery Narratives is also notable for its richly textured empirical material. It will become a key text in the emerging interdisciplinary field of cosmetic surgery studies.' - Professor Ruth Holliday, University of Leeds, UK, co-author of Pleasure Zones: Bodies, Cities, Spaces and Kitsch! Cultural Politics and Taste 'This book is an essential text for anyone interested in sociology and the body. It addresses key areas about embodiment through narratives told by British and North American women about cosmetic surgery. Debra Gimlin enlightens us about far more than these groups, though: her fine scholarly eye guides the reader through crucial wider issues such as the body as project, medical consumerism, and the historic, cultural and economic factors that have created the distinctive US and UK healthcare systems. By being attentive to the remarkable voices of her interviewees and applying powerful analytical tools of repertoire theory Gimlin shows how the stories we tell about our bodies are not merely individual, they are also windows into national cultural values.' - Meredith Jones, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, and author of Skintight: An Anatomy of Cosmetic Surgery and co-editor (with Cressida Heyes) of Cosmetic Surgery: A Feminist Primer
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Summaries
Main Description
This book examines British and American women's narratives of cosmetic surgery collected between 1995 and 2007, with particular attention to what those narratives say about the contemporary status of cosmetic surgery and "local" ideas about its legitimate and illegitimate uses. The book argues that British and American women employ justificatory strategies that normalize aesthetic procedures by aligning them with nationally-specific notions of "appropriate" medical treatment. Consumers' narratives are also informed by "global" discourses that portray cosmetic surgery as a lifestyle choice and a tool for holding one's own in the competitive marketplace of employment or heterosexual romance. Such meanings are in turn reworked by women in their own accounting, at the same time that accounts are limited by culturally-available symbolic resources and institutional structures. Where the general and specific are incompatible as is more often the case in the British context women respond by stressing the power of externally-imposed appearance mandates and their entitlement to self-care.
Description for Bookstore
This book examines British and American women's narratives of cosmetic surgery
Long Description
This book examines British and American women's narratives of cosmetic surgery collected between 1995 and 2007, with particular attention to what those narratives say about the contemporary status of cosmetic surgery and 'local' ideas about its legitimate and illegitimate uses. The book argues that British and American women employ justificatory strategies that normalize aesthetic procedures by aligning them with nationally-specific notions of 'appropriate' medical treatment. Consumers' narratives are also informed by 'global' discourses that portray cosmetic surgery as a lifestyle choice and a tool for holding one's own in the competitive marketplace of employment or heterosexual romance. Such meanings are in turn reworked by women in their own accounting, at the same time that accounts are limited by culturally-available symbolic resources and institutional structures. Where the general and specific are incompatible as is more often the case in the British context women respond by stressing the power of externally-imposed appearance mandates and their entitlement to self-care.
Bowker Data Service Summary
This title examines British and American women's narratives of cosmetic surgery, exploring what those narratives say about the contemporary status of cosmetic surgery and 'local' ideas about its legitimate and illegitimate uses.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgementsp. viii
Introductionp. 1
Cosmetic Surgery in Two Healthcare Contextsp. 26
Accounts of Embodiment and Their Cultural Repertoiresp. 55
Evaluating Cosmetic Surgery in Britain and the USp. 80
The Symbolic Boundaries of Surgical 'Otherness'p. 103
US Repertoires in a Changing Surgical Landscapep. 126
Conclusionsp. 153
Notesp. 167
Referencesp. 171
Indexp. 189
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem