Catalogue


The Russian people and foreign policy [electronic resource] : Russian elite and mass perspectives, 1993-2000 /
William Zimmerman.
imprint
Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 2002.
description
1 online resource (ix, 235 p.)
ISBN
9781400824991
format(s)
Book
More Details
imprint
Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 2002.
isbn
9781400824991
restrictions
Licensed for access by U. of T. users.
catalogue key
11377711
 
Includes bibliographical references and index.
A Look Inside
Reviews
Review Quotes
A very significant contribution to the field of Russian studies. There is really nothing like it out there. The book also holds great interest for political scientists who do not work on Russia, as the findings relate to debates that grew out of studies of American public opinion. The author has a track record as a specialist on the communist world whose work has always tested hypotheses drawn from broader theoretical literatures. He has done it again. And done it very well.
First-rate. A brief description cannot do justice to the richness of the data and analyses inThe Russian People and Foreign Policy. Moreover, Zimmerman knows the literature on U.S. public opinion and he succeeds admirably in making comparisons where it is appropriate to do so.
This book is of such high quality that I would not be surprised if its publication will depress future scholarship on the subject for some time to come. The standard it sets is simply too high for others to match.
Zimmerman argues convincingly that the opinions of elite groups have consequences for Russian foreign policy . . . and that elite groups' opinions regarding Russia's political economy have important implications for relations with the West.
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.
Summaries
Main Description
Since the fall of communism, public opinion in Russia, including that of a now more diverse elite, has become a substantial factor in that country's policymaking process. What this opinion might be and how it responds to American actions is the subject of this study. William Zimmerman offers important and sometimes disturbing insight into the thinking of citizens in America's former Cold War adversary about such matters as NATO expansion. Drawing on nearly a decade of unprecedented surveys he conducted with a wide spectrum of the Russian public, he gauges the impact of Russia's opening on its foreign policy and how liberal democrats orient themselves to foreign policy. He also shows that insights from the study of American foreign policy are often "portable" to the study of Russian foreign policy attitudes. As Zimmerman shows, the general public, which had a modest but real role in foreign policy decision making, tended much more toward isolationism than did the predominant elites who steered Russia's foreign policy in the 1990s. Interspersing smooth prose with a wide array of richly informative tables, the book represents an invaluable opportunity to discern probable shifts in Russian foreign policy that domestic political changes would bring. And it powerfully suggests that the West, by forging its own policies toward Russia with more prudence, can have a say in the outcome of the great choice facing Russia--whether to forge ahead with democracy or slip back into authoritarianism.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgmentsp. vii
Introductionp. 1
Elites, Attentive Publics, and Masses in Post-Soviet Russiap. 18
Politics and Markets, with Judith Kullbergp. 43
Elite-Mass Interactions, Knowledge, and Russian Foreign Policyp. 88
Orientations to the International System and Electoral Behavior in Russiap. 123
Elite Political-Economic Orientations and Foreign Policyp. 149
NATO Expansion Past and Future: A Closer Lookp. 187
Conclusionp. 216
Selected Bibliographyp. 227
Indexp. 233
Table of Contents provided by Publisher. All Rights Reserved.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem