Catalogue

COVID-19: Updates on library services and operations.

Democracy in Kingston [electronic resource] : a social movement in urban politics, 1965-1970 /
Richard Harris.
imprint
Kingston [Ont.] : McGill-Queen's University Press, c1988.
description
xv, 203 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
ISBN
0773505830
format(s)
Book
More Details
imprint
Kingston [Ont.] : McGill-Queen's University Press, c1988.
isbn
0773505830
restrictions
Licensed for access by U. of T. users.
catalogue key
10500584
 
Includes bibliographical references and index.
A Look Inside
Summaries
Main Description
A reform movement in Kingston emerged in 1965, developed steadily over five years, and then rapidly disintegrated. The two major strands of reformers, the New Left and a more diffuse movement of the middle class, drew together in 1968, focusing on the issues of rental housing and urban renewal. The reformers sustained an intense level of political opposition for over two years but, for a variety of reasons, by the end of 1970 the movement had fallen apart and the remaining fragments had apparently lost influence. Harris analyses the reform movement in Kingston in relation to the broader context of reform in North America, suggesting that the distinctive possibilities and problems created by the post-war urban milieu led to the formation of an urban reform movement that polarized city politics along class lines. He argues that at the local level the specific nature of urban reform is shaped by the complex social geography of class and domestic property ownership within each city. Kingston's reform movement had only a limited immediate effect upon the economic and political conditions within the city. Typical of the urban and social refrom movements as a whole, however, its longer term effect upon social attitudes and democratic process has been much greater, and more significant, than has been shown previously.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem