Catalogue


Residue evaluation of certain veterinary drugs /
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, 75th meeting, Rome, Italy, 8-17 November 2011.
imprint
Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012.
description
xi, 177, [1] p. : ill. ; 30 cm.
ISBN
9251072558, 9789251072554
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012.
isbn
9251072558
9789251072554
general note
"I2766E/1/05.12"--Page 4 of cover.
catalogue key
10380264
 
Includes bibliographical references.
A Look Inside
Summaries
Main Description
This document contains monographs on residue evaluations of certain veterinary drugs, prepared at the seventy-fifth meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), which was held in Rome, Italy form 8 to 17 November 2011. Four substances were evaluated for the first time for the animal species concerned -- amoxicillin, apramycin, derquantel and monepantel. Three subtances were reassessed, monensin, narasin and triclabendzole. This publication and other documents produced by JECFA contain information that is useful to those who work with or are involved with recommending or controlling maximum residue limits for veterinary drugs in foods of animal origins.
Main Description
This document contains monographs on residue evaluations of certain veterinary drugs, prepared at the seventy-fifth meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), which was held in Rome, Italy from 8 to 17 November 2011. Four substances were evaluated for the first time for the animal species concerned -- amoxicillin, apramycin, derquantel and monepantel. Three subtances were reassessed, monensin, narasin and triclabendzole. This publication and other documents produced by JECFA contain information that is useful to those who work with or are involved with recommending or controlling maximum residue limits for veterinary drugs in foods of animal origins.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem