Cats are not peas : a calico history of genetics /
Laura Gould.
imprint
New York, NY : Copernicus, c1996.
description
xvi, 228 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.
ISBN
0387947965 (hardcover : alk. paper)
format(s)
Book
Holdings
More Details
imprint
New York, NY : Copernicus, c1996.
isbn
0387947965 (hardcover : alk. paper)
catalogue key
620655
 
Includes bibliographical references (p. [199]-215) and indexes.
A Look Inside
Full Text Reviews
Appeared in Choice on 1997-02-01:
This is surely the most unusual history of genetics in print. The author, not a genetics professional, set out to understand the genetics of her male tortoiseshell cat (he turned out to be an XXY/XY mosaic) and, in the process, has combined anecdotes about her cats, what digging up information is like, and much of the history of classical genetics. There are some mentions of peas and Drosophila, but the book offers thorough coverage of publications on the inheritance of the main coat-color genes in cats, exhaustive enough that it is worth reading as a history of genetics. Although other works are less idiosyncratic and provide broader coverage, this book is more interesting (unless one cannot abide cats), as the author clearly has an inquisitive mind and is a good writer. There are appropriate diagrams and figures, a glossary, and even a list of questions. This reviewer wishes that Gould had not decided to substitute her own term "reluctance" for nondisjunction. Doing so is strange, especially since she uses many other standard genetics terms. Nevertheless, a book for all levels of readers. M. LaBar Southern Wesleyan University
Reviews
This item was reviewed in:
BIOSIS, February 1997
Choice, February 1997
To find out how to look for other reviews, please see our guides to finding book reviews in the Sciences or Social Sciences and Humanities.

This information is provided by a service that aggregates data from review sources and other sources that are often consulted by libraries, and readers. The University does not edit this information and merely includes it as a convenience for users. It does not warrant that reviews are accurate. As with any review users should approach reviews critically and where deemed necessary should consult multiple review sources. Any concerns or questions about particular reviews should be directed to the reviewer and/or publisher.

  link to old catalogue

Report a problem